Who’s Missing on the Mat? Interview with Malory Graham

Malory Graham Sensei started Aikido training in 1988 with Paul Sylvain Sensei and founded Seattle Aikikai in 1997 as a community-run dojo. She received her 6th Dan from Yoshimitsu Yamada Shihan in 2014 and continues to develop her own training with Yoko Okamoto Sensei and Chris Mulligan Sensei of Aikido Kyoto.  Along with teaching Aikido and yoga, she has had tandem careers as a filmmaker and non-profit Executive Director. She has made films to promote women in Aikido and has been deeply committed to the social justice/youth development field.


Josh Gold: Thank you for taking the time to talk with Aikido Journal. Can you share a bit about your Aikido origin story? 

Malory Graham: When I first started Aikido in 1988 at Hampshire College, I had two pathways that I was interested in, both film production and Aikido, side-by-side. And for many years, I did both. I ran a film school for girls, specifically trying to get more women into the film industry in Hollywood, as well as running a dojo in Seattle.  

I’ve always loved having those two different components of my life. That interest led me to make Aikido videos in the ’90s which was a fun way to get to know the larger Aikido community, both nationally and internationally. I produced videos for some of the prominent Shihan (master teachers) in America, as well as making a documentary called Holding Up Half the Sky, which profiled 10 pioneering women in The United States Aikido Federation. That project took me all over the country interviewing women Aikido instructors who were running their own dojos. 

I know you’ve recently put a larger focus on analyzing and finding ways to improve diversity and inclusion in the Aikido world. Before the pandemic, Aikido Journal led the largest survey ever done in the art of Aikido. The results illuminated some important facts. There’s a real lack of young people in Aikido. Only 16% of Aikido practitioners are women, and we’re heavily underrepresented in Latino and black practitioners. What’s your current thinking on this?

Your study was really illuminating and got me thinking. So, if we are looking at an art that we all love, that we want to thrive, it really begs the question of “Who’s missing on the mat?” And if we want to grow the art, I think it makes sense to look at those missing demographics and figure out why they’re missing. If we want to grow the art, we should spend less time online arguing about the effectiveness of Aikido and instead put our energy towards getting these missing demographics involved.

Malory Graham at Seattle Aikikai

If there is any martial art that has a philosophical underpinning that supports this idea of inclusion, I really do believe it’s Aikido. That is why the demographics are so troubling. I can count the number of African-American dojo-cho that I know on one hand. And you are more likely to see women running the registration table than teaching at some aikido camps. It’s 2022 and that is baffling to me.

If you are a dojo-cho and want to grow your dojo and the art, you should look at the census tipping point projections. Our white majority is going to tip in 2043 with a huge rise in both Asian and Hispanic Americans. For me, that’s fascinating to look at and ask, “How do we plan for that in our dojos?”

There is a culture change that we are living through right now, with the Black Lives Matter movement, with the Me Too movement, with the non-binary, trans movement, and I don’t think Aikido has kept up with these societal changes.  I don’t think there is any dojo out there that would say, “We are purposely racist or sexist or homophobic.” They all say, “Our doors are open to everybody.” But then why are most dojos white and male? There’s a huge difference between saying our doors are open to everybody versus being proactive in terms of making your space inclusive and welcoming. And in some cases, dojo-chos’ own unconscious, implicit  biases, might play a role in why specific populations aren’t entering your dojo. It’s a starting  place for us to look at helping dojos become more inclusive.

If there is any martial art that has a philosophical underpinning that supports this idea of inclusion, I really do believe it’s Aikido. That is why the demographics are so troubling. I can count the number of African-American dojo-cho that I know on one hand. And you are more likely to see women running the registration table than teaching at many Aikido camps. It’s 2022 and that is baffling to me.

One of my favorite Martin Luther King Jr. quotes is “Love is not the answer. It is the assignment.” O-Sensei left us with the same mandate. So, as we look at inclusion in Aikido, it is a natural outgrowth of the physical practice of Aikido which is about creating harmony rather than control by force,  that we mirror that off the mat by cultivating diversity and lifting up minority populations. 

We talked about this in some detail when you contributed time to helping get Budo Accelerator off the ground during the pandemic. The organization has had pretty good success in building a diverse group of Aikido practitioners since then. We’ve been using my dojo as a home base to refine what we’re doing before partnering with dojos to run programs in other regions.  Even before Budo Accelerator, women comprised 50% of our dojo, but now 60% of students are in the 16-24 age group, and over 70% are non-white.  I can tell you that having an influx of young people from diverse backgrounds brings great energy into our dojo. Our dojo is better and stronger for the change.  

Yes! I was so inspired by working with Budo Accelerator students. It is a great example of ways that dojos can be proactive in attracting a younger diverse student body. And I think young people are hungry for what Aikido has to offer if it is presented in an inclusive way. 

Budo Accelerator students at Ikazuchi Dojo, fall 2022

Another project that I’ve been excited about is the new Aikido IDEA Project (Inclusion, Diversity, Equity & Access) under the leadership of Sam Taitel and César San Miguel. The goal is to help dojos have those hard but constructive conversations about who is missing from our mats. They are putting out a fabulous newsletter with thought-provoking articles as well as resources for dojos. The project is also giving away grant money for diversity and inclusion projects. It’s one thing to talk about making Aikido more inclusive, but another thing to do the work. And often that work needs money. 

What kind of diversity projects are they funding? 

Project ideas for these micro-grants (which are $250-$500) could be anything. They can be for either individuals or dojos and the only criteria is that they aim to “make the future of Aikido more inclusive.” They could be for a dojo that wants to offer diversity training for their membership and needs funds to hire a facilitator. It could cover the cost of putting instructors through sexual harassment prevention training. It could cover costs for an individual POC who has never had the opportunity to attend a summer camp.  There are endless possibilities of what this grant could fund. You can check out the online application on the website.

César San Miguel and Sam Taitel

How do you think Aikido organizations are doing, in general, to foster diversity and inclusion? Do you think there is a need to have policies or guidelines in place at an organizational and / or a dojo level to support or address these things?

When we are looking at Aikido as being inclusive and non-discriminatory, in the best world, you have someone running a dojo or running an organization who is brilliant, ethical, and benevolent, without cultural bias–but that’s not always the case. So building in structures that are designed to prevent abuses of power and support diversity, is really important. It’s a reason why I think a nonprofit structure for a dojo or Aikido organization makes a lot of sense. 

Instead of a dojo-cho just assuming the ethical standards of leadership, you build in a system where it can’t just be one person on top making all the decisions, but there are checks and balances between a chief instructor and a board of directors.

In the last decade or so, corporations in America have had to completely revise their sexual harassment policies and their non-discrimination policies, purely from a risk management perspective. Any dojo or organization that does not have those things in place today, is operating at a risk because it’s behavior that may have been tolerated in the past, but no longer will be.

For those interested in learning more or getting guidelines and policies in place, do you have any pointers?

Yes! There is a new MeToo Aikido website created by Neilu Naini that has some useful resources, links to online trainings, as well as a self-assessment checklist that dojo can go through to determine if they have proper procedures in place regarding harassment issues.  It’s not meant to be a shaming tool. It’s really meant to be a self-analysis tool. And there is a basic pledge for both individuals and dojos to sign that is a good way to affirm your commitment to the belief that all people have the right to practice Aikido free of abuse.

But we also need to go deeper into the culture of organizations. We can put stuff on paper, and have all the anti-harassment stuff in place, but if people don’t realize that they are unconsciously participating in a culture that is discriminatory, there isn’t actually going to be real change. 

Thank you for your work in this area and for sharing your thoughts with the Aikido community. 

Josh Gold

Executive Editor of Aikido Journal, CEO of Budo Accelerator, and Chief Instructor of Ikazuchi Dojo.

15 comments

  • “I want considerate people to listen to the voice of Aikido. It is not for correcting others; it is for correcting your own mind. This is Aikido. This is the mission of Aikido and should be your mission.”
    — Morihei Ueshiba

    When you take what is intended as a Path of personal transformation and try to make it a lever for external social change … particularly with a ‘modern woke-ish agenda’ as your standard … you have started down the road of organized religions, political parties, and cults of all kinds. It is a slippery slope with a very checkered historical record.

    Perhaps the current demographics of the Aikido population is the result/fault of the way Aikido has been presenting itself (sensei’s) and trains in its dojos (rank and file) … and not due so much to society’s ills … however you might wish choose to characterize them. The message, like much of the waza itself, has become mired in mediocrity and ineffectiveness … imho.

    Based on my read, Aikido has a poor reputation … almost universally in the Martial Arts world … and society at large could care less. Just ask them. Very little external leverage here.

    What has always attracted me to Aikido was O’Sensei’s dedication to the individual transformative potential of a deeply committed personal practice … and thereby, transforming society from within.

    To the extent that Aikidoists have been (and, yes, still are) abusive physically and sexually, dishonest business people, discriminatory in their favors and rewards, criminally conspiratorial in their dealings with society, then institutional internal mechanisms to stop this are appropriate and just; even involving law enforcement when necessary.

    “Love and protection for all creation.” starts within each of us. And then this disposition and its attendant benefits flow outward in ripples.

    O’Sensei wanted ‘considerate people’ to listen.
    That means that they are so disposed to begin with and that they are already ‘leaning in’ to the message and the practice.

    People came to O’Sensei because he had that ‘something-something’ they were looking for. He didn’t take to the streets with a bullhorn and a flag … and browbeat others.

    For what it’s worth … a better world begins within each of as a natural consequence of transforming ourselves; head, heart, body, and soul.

    Peace Out …

    – David Brown
    Sandan
    Aiki Hombu

    • Excellent read! Thank you. O’ Sensei was often quoted as wanting ,”to make the whole world one (paraphrase). What most aikidoka are unaware of is that up until 1960 he meant under Japanese domination. That sounds like racism to me.

      • MARK:

        Just to confirm your historical point …
        From an interview with O’Sensei in 1956.
        ___________

        Sangenkai Newsletter
        Aikido Sangenkai – Honolulu Hawaii

        • Additional comment actions
        Interview with Morihei Ueshiba, 1956:

        The Emperor is democracy.
        …………

        UESHIBA:

        “Sorry to insist on the subject of the Emperor but to have harmony, the Emperor is necessary.
        The Emperor is the center, regardless of the social classes; military, agricultural, industrial, and mercantile. In Japan, the Emperor is the center and his extensions divide the administration of state affairs among themselves. There are three or four divisions such as ministers, vice-ministers, and subjects, and all these are created to administrate natural state affairs. Therefore, killing a person is the same as cutting your own finger. This is why the subjects should be considered important. It should be a great democracy.”

        INTERVIEWER:
        “You mean that we should all become friends, with the Emperor as our center?”

        UESHIBA:
        “Obviously, and you know that.”
        (laughs)

  • Just wondering how much of this lack of diversity is an “Aikido issue” vs an “Aikido in USA issue”?

    If it’s just the later, then a quick study of American history should explain the majority (dojo Cho and higher ranking )old white male demographic you see.

    Globally I don’t see this as an issue, but I’ve trained outside of just the USA.

  • This is an area in which I have made some attempts to teach aikido, but I am a person who does better fitting into a niche,, that one who creates one. I have been excited by your program, Josh, and loved the ideas and valid concerns that Mallory brought up. I really appreciate both your efforts.
    I think it would be possible to go for bigger grants , especially in areas where non-violence programs are making inroads. I also think high schools and colleges that require credits for physical ed could work. I taught in a college where students got 1 credit for one hour a week,so I had classes that were well-attended.
    Wish I were closer to some of these efforts. Thank you both.

  • JOSH:

    I was talking with some of my old Aikido buddies (We trained with Stan at his Monterey Dojo back in the 70’s.) about this article:

    WHO’s MISSING ON THE MAT? Interview with Malory Graham

    At one point there were 9 Comments, and now there are 8. The one missing had a quote from an article by Peter Goldsbury, who in addition to his position as IAF President, has been a prodigious contributor to AJ over the decades.

    The subject of this article has great relevancy in the current cultural climate. We can expect strong opinions and feelings covering the spectrum of POV’s.

    Open and sincere discussion is not just appropriate, it is vital. It’s that freedom of speech thing.

    So, my question: What happened to that Comment?

    • Hi David!

      The author of the comment you mentioned emailed us yesterday and asked us to withdraw / remove their comment. We only censor / remove comments if they are disparaging, make accusations of others anonymously, or otherwise violate our community standards.

  • It is ironic that this kind of outlook sets out to correct “unconscious” bias by employing actual, conscious bias.

    I would never, ever disqualify any deserving members of my school from any financial support based merely on the color of their skin. This kind of racism should be summarily rejected by all head instructors and school owners.

    As a head instructor for decades, I have had wonderful students who were the blackest of black and porcelain white…and every shade in between. And if we limited such grants to only POC among our membership, who exactly would qualify? Do mixed race mudansha make the cut? How about the new 3rd kyu with the Mexican grandmother only on one side? Are we going to implement the one drop rule in our dojos? It is all so toxic.

    It we are serious about promoting the art of Aikido and increasing peace and good will within our schools, then I suggest we stay as far away from any and all racism that rears its ugly head.

    Because what’s next? POC students will only have to do 4 techniques on the USAF 5th kyu exam while all white students will have to do all 7….amid shouts for “equity”?

    Please let us not treat any of our students like this. Lord have mercy.

    • I’m unhappy with the use of “unconscious bias” as an explanatory concept. I don’t deny that there can be such a thing. However, it seems to be too easy to invoke, but very difficult to either support or disprove.

      For example, there are very few Welshmen in the Nigerian Government. I can say this is because Nigerians have an unconscious bias against Welshmen. But what sort of evidence can support this claim? I’m really not sure. ( The lack of Welshmen in the Nigerian Government is the phenomenon to be explained, so it cannot be evidence for the explanation.)
      And how could you show I am wrong? You could show that very few Welshmen attempt to become members of the NG, but I can reply that they unconsciously recognise the unconscious bias against them, and so do not make the attempt.
      Perhaps we should urge the NG to institute diversity and inclusion programmes.

      Yes, I am a retired lecturer in philosophy.

  • There seems to be a view that “diversity” is itself a virtue, that we have some sort of moral obligation to make any group look like a Benetton ad. I think this is piffle.

    As far as Aikido is concerned, I started practicing while I was living and working in Saudi Arabia. The instructor was a Pakistani, the students were a mix of nationalities. And I have trained in the UK, Japan, Sweden, the USA, and now Australia.

    In none of the many dojos I have practiced in did I ever see or hear of anyone being excluded on the basis of race, sex, or religion. Even redheads and Americans were welcomed.

    For my own dojo I want more people for the Monday night training, but in Australia we have pettifogging laws that prevent me from dragging people in off the street, so I have to wait for people who see the website to turn up. This means that the people who are on the mats are those who are interested, who have looked for a martial art, and chosen this one. They are the people who want to be there.

    Who is missing? The people who are not interested.

  • Stop silencing women commenters on aikido journal. This me too movement means nothing when the me too “organizers” are silencing women who have been assaulted and continue to protect the men.

    Hell is when men believe it’s their right to seed women and women have no say while coercing the women and brainwashing them to have no desires of their own. Heaven on earth is when women can have their own desires.

    • Aikido Journal does not silence women commenters. We require that all people (of any gender) who post / comment on the site do so with a valid email address and meet generally accepted community practices. We’ve had plenty of women who comment on Aikido Journal and have been highlighted in interviews, news, and instructional content. Generally, the only comments we’ve rejected on our site are spam, comments that are hateful in nature, or comments made using fake email addresses and names.

Archives